Advertisement

Herbicide Testing: Resistance, Residues, and Soil Impact

As herbicide resistance continues to evolve and regulatory scrutiny intensifies, robust testing practices will remain a cornerstone of sustainable crop protection strategies.

by | Apr 16, 2025

Introduction: The Role of Herbicide Testing in Agriculture

Herbicides are critical tools in modern agriculture, enabling effective weed control to protect crop yields and maintain field productivity. With the intensification of farming practices and the widespread adoption of chemical weed management, the importance of herbicide testing has grown significantly. Herbicide testing refers to the scientific evaluation of herbicides across three main dimensions: detecting herbicide resistance in weed populations, analyzing chemical residues in harvested crops and food products, and studying herbicide fate and transport in soil environments.

Routine and regulatory herbicide testing plays a key role in modern agrochemical stewardship, helping to delay resistance development, ensure compliance with maximum residue limits (MRLs), and assess potential risks to soil health, water quality, and non-target species. By combining molecular biology, analytical chemistry, and environmental science, herbicide testing supports integrated weed management (IWM), food safety regulation, sustainable agriculture, and environmental protection.

This article explores the most common forms of herbicide testing—resistance screening, residue analysis, and soil persistence evaluation—and their value in securing long-term agricultural productivity, regulatory compliance, and ecological integrity.


Herbicide Resistance Testing

What Is Herbicide Resistance?

Herbicide resistance occurs when a weed population evolves the ability to survive herbicide applications that would normally be effective. This phenomenon threatens the long-term viability of chemical weed control and can result in significant yield losses.

Testing Methods

  • Greenhouse Bioassays: Seeds or whole plants from suspected resistant populations are grown under controlled greenhouse conditions and exposed to different concentrations of herbicides. Researchers observe plant growth, injury levels, and survival rates to determine whether resistance is present. This method allows for early screening of resistance before it is confirmed at the molecular level. For example, reduced efficacy of glyphosate in Palmer amaranth can be identified through bioassay trials.
  • Whole-Plant Screening: This approach involves applying labeled field rates of herbicides to mature plants collected from agricultural fields where resistance is suspected. It helps evaluate the practical performance of herbicides under realistic use conditions and confirms resistance severity. It’s particularly useful for detecting resistance in weed species like kochia or waterhemp, which often exhibit multiple resistance mechanisms.
  • Molecular and Genetic Tests: Advanced laboratory methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR (qPCR), and DNA sequencing are used to identify specific genetic mutations that confer herbicide resistance. Common targets include the acetolactate synthase (ALS), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase), and 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) genes. These tests can rapidly confirm resistance and differentiate between target-site and non-target-site resistance mechanisms, supporting integrated weed management and stewardship efforts.

Applications and Importance

Herbicide resistance testing serves several critical purposes in agricultural systems. By identifying resistant biotypes early—often before they become widespread—growers and agronomists can take proactive measures to prevent resistance from escalating into a broader management crisis. Early detection allows for quick intervention using alternate chemistries or cultural practices, thereby preserving herbicide efficacy.

This information also plays a central role in shaping Integrated Weed Management (IWM) strategies, which combine chemical, mechanical, and biological controls to minimize reliance on any single approach. Resistance data inform rotational herbicide use and alternative weed suppression tactics that reduce selection pressure on weed populations.

Additionally, testing supports stewardship programs implemented by herbicide manufacturers, extension agencies, and regulatory bodies. These programs rely on resistance monitoring to ensure products are used responsibly and remain effective over time. Incorporating resistance data into training and best practice guidelines helps extend the lifespan of existing herbicides and protect long-term crop productivity.


Herbicide Residue Testing

Purpose of Residue Analysis

Residue testing ensures that herbicide levels in harvested crops, food products, and animal feed comply with regulatory limits, often expressed as Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs).

Analytical Techniques

  • Gas Chromatography (GC) and GC-MS: These techniques are used for analyzing volatile and thermally stable herbicide compounds, such as 2,4-D and trifluralin. GC separates herbicide residues based on volatility, while GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry) adds a layer of molecular identification and quantification, making it highly effective for confirmatory testing in complex matrices like processed foods.
  • Liquid Chromatography (LC-MS/MS): This is the preferred method for detecting non-volatile, thermally labile, or highly polar herbicides such as glyphosate, atrazine, paraquat, and glufosinate. LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry) provides high sensitivity and selectivity, making it suitable for trace residue analysis in fruits, vegetables, cereals, and water. It is especially important for regulatory testing due to its ability to meet low detection limits set by MRLs.
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA): ELISA is a rapid, cost-effective screening method used primarily in food safety programs to detect specific herbicide residues in agricultural commodities. It uses antibodies that selectively bind to herbicide molecules, enabling quick identification of substances like atrazine, simazine, or glyphosate. While not as specific as chromatographic methods, ELISA is valuable for preliminary screening and large-scale monitoring programs.

Regulatory Context

  • Monitored by agencies such as the EPA (U.S.), EFSA (Europe), and Codex Alimentarius, herbicide residues in food and feed are subject to strict regulatory oversight to protect public health.
  • Samples are tested to ensure compliance with established Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for each herbicide-crop combination. These limits are based on toxicological evaluations and dietary exposure assessments.
  • Exceeding MRLs may trigger regulatory actions such as product recalls, import bans, or revised usage guidelines, emphasizing the importance of accurate and routine herbicide residue testing across the global food supply chain.

Herbicide Soil Testing

Importance of Soil Testing

lab tecchnician holding a brown bottle of Glyphosate herbicide
Glyphosate herbicide is commonly tested for in agricultural settings.
Credit: iStock | Kittisak Kaewchalun

Herbicide persistence and mobility in soil can have long-lasting effects on agricultural productivity, environmental quality, and regulatory compliance. Residual herbicides may impact future crops planted in the same field (carryover injury), damage adjacent vegetation through leaching or volatilization, or contaminate water resources when transported through runoff or infiltration. Testing for herbicide residues in soil is especially important for rotation-sensitive crops such as legumes, fruits, and leafy greens, which may be more susceptible to herbicide carryover.

Parameters Assessed

  • Half-life (DT50): The time required for 50% of the applied herbicide to degrade. This value indicates persistence and helps determine safe replant intervals and field-use restrictions.
  • Soil adsorption coefficient (Koc): Reflects how strongly a herbicide binds to soil particles. Compounds with high Koc values (e.g., trifluralin) are less mobile, while low Koc values (e.g., atrazine) suggest higher leaching potential.
  • Leaching potential: Estimated through lysimeter studies or soil column tests, this parameter determines how likely a herbicide is to reach groundwater or tile-drained systems. It’s critical for environmental risk assessments and compliance with water protection regulations.

Testing Methods

  • Soil core sampling and laboratory incubation: Soil samples are collected at various depths and incubated under controlled temperature and moisture conditions. Degradation rates and metabolite formation are tracked over time.
  • Field dissipation studies: Conducted under natural environmental conditions, these studies monitor herbicide degradation, transport, and transformation in actual agricultural fields over a growing season or longer.
  • LC-MS/MS and GC-MS: High-resolution instrumental methods used to quantify trace herbicide residues and breakdown products in soil samples. These techniques offer high specificity and sensitivity, enabling detection at parts-per-billion (ppb) levels.

Management Implications

  • Informs replant intervals and crop rotation schedules by predicting when soil concentrations will drop below phytotoxic levels for sensitive species.
  • Provides essential data for herbicide registration and re-registration, particularly for regulatory submissions to the EPA or equivalent international bodies.
  • Supports risk assessment and remediation planning in contaminated sites or sensitive areas such as buffer zones, wetlands, and water recharge areas.
  • Enhances sustainable land use decisions, especially for no-till and conservation agriculture systems where soil herbicide residues may persist longer due to limited incorporation or microbial activity.

Emerging Trends and Technologies

Precision Application and Monitoring

Precision herbicide application relies on technologies such as GPS-enabled sprayers and real-time sensor-guided weed detection systems. These tools enable site-specific application of herbicides, targeting only areas where weeds are present and avoiding overlap or underapplication. For example, optical spot sprayers like the WeedSeeker or Weed-it systems identify chlorophyll-containing plants and trigger herbicide release only when necessary. This minimizes chemical input, lowers production costs, and reduces the risk of environmental contamination from herbicide drift or runoff.

Rapid Testing Kits

Rapid on-site testing technologies are expanding access to herbicide monitoring in the field. ELISA-based kits and handheld chromatography instruments allow growers, inspectors, and consultants to detect herbicide residues or resistance indicators within minutes. These tools are particularly useful for preharvest inspections, post-application safety checks, and screening in remote areas without laboratory infrastructure. For instance, portable glyphosate test strips are now available for use on farm produce, offering fast screening for regulatory compliance.

AI and Big Data in Resistance Management

Artificial intelligence (AI) and big data analytics are revolutionizing how herbicide resistance is tracked and mitigated. Machine learning models can analyze vast datasets that include historical herbicide usage, weed biotype mapping, genetic profiles, and environmental conditions. These tools help predict where resistance is likely to develop and identify effective management strategies. Platforms like xarvio® FIELD MANAGER and Corteva’s Granular Insights offer resistance risk scoring and personalized herbicide rotation plans based on field-level data, enabling proactive decision-making in resistance prevention.​


Connect with Certified Herbicide Testing Laboratories

If you’re a grower, manufacturer, or researcher in need of reliable herbicide testing, ContractLaboratory.com can help you find the right third-party lab to meet your needs. Our global network of accredited laboratories offers:

  • ISO-certified herbicide residue analysis to ensure compliance with global food safety and regulatory standards
  • Herbicide resistance confirmation testing using greenhouse, molecular, or whole-plant methods to support integrated weed management
  • Soil persistence and environmental impact assessments for registration, remediation, and sustainability planning

Whether you’re seeking routine compliance testing or customized research protocols, ContractLaboratory.com simplifies the lab selection process. Get matched with qualified partners equipped with the specialized instrumentation, certifications, and scientific expertise you need to meet your goals.

Submit Your Herbicide Testing Request Now


Final Thoughts

Herbicide testing is essential for safeguarding crop yields, consumer health, and environmental quality. By combining laboratory science with field-based monitoring and digital decision tools, the agricultural industry can proactively manage herbicide performance and safety.

As herbicide resistance continues to evolve and regulatory scrutiny intensifies, robust testing practices will remain a cornerstone of sustainable crop protection strategies.


Author

  • Trevor Henderson BSc (HK), MSc, PhD (c), is the Creative Services Director for the Laboratory Products Group at LabX Media Group. He has more than three decades of experience in the fields of scientific and technical writing, editing, and creative content creation. With academic training in the areas of human biology, physical anthropology, and community health, he has a broad skill set of both laboratory and analytical skills. Since 2013, he has been working with LabX Media Group developing content solutions that engage and inform scientists and laboratorians.

    View all posts Director, Creative Services - LabX Media Group

Related Content

Advertisement

Editor's Choice

Advertisement

Advertisement