Advertisement

Flow Cytometry vs FACS: Understanding the Differences in Cell Sorting

Flow cytometry and FACS offer unique features, applications, advantages.

by | Sep 26, 2024

Flow cytometry and Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) are two widely used techniques in cell biology, immunology, and clinical research. While they share similarities, they have distinct purposes and applications. This article will break down the key differences, helping you understand how flow cytometry vs FACS work, their unique features, and how to choose the right method for your cell sorting needs.

What is Flow Cytometry?

Flow cytometry is a laser-based technology used to analyze the physical and chemical characteristics of cells or particles in a fluid stream. It allows researchers to measure parameters such as cell size, granularity, and the expression of specific markers using fluorescently labeled antibodies. Choosing the correct flow cytometer for your application is essential to ensure comprehensive cellular analysis.

Key Components of Flow Cytometry:

  • Fluidics: Delivers cells in a single file through a stream for analysis.
  • Optics: Utilizes lasers to illuminate cells and detect fluorescence.
  • Electronics: Converts light signals into electronic data for analysis.

Common Applications:

  • Immunophenotyping
  • Cell counting
  • Cell viability analysis
  • Detection of intracellular and surface proteins

What is FACS (Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting)?

FACS is a specialized type of flow cytometry that not only analyzes cells but also sorts them based on their fluorescent characteristics. It is commonly used when researchers need to separate cells of interest from a heterogeneous population for further analysis or experimentation.

Key Components of FACS:

  • Sorting Mechanism: After cells pass through the laser, FACS uses charged plates to deflect and separate cells into different containers based on their fluorescent signal.
  • Detection and Analysis: Just like flow cytometry, FACS also relies on fluorescent markers to identify specific cell populations.

Common Applications:

  • Isolation of specific cell populations (e.g., stem cells, immune cells)
  • Single-cell analysis
  • Preparation of samples for downstream applications (e.g., RNA sequencing, culture studies)

Flow Cytometry vs FACS: Core Differences

CriteriaFlow CytometryFACS
FunctionalityAnalyzes cells based on size, granularity, and fluorescenceAnalyzes and sorts cells based on fluorescence
Cell SortingCannot sort cells; only measuresSorts and separates cells into different populations
ThroughputHigher throughput; faster analysisLower throughput due to sorting process
ComplexityRelatively simplerMore complex due to the additional sorting mechanism
CostGenerally more affordableMore expensive due to added sorting capabilities
UsageUsed for immunophenotyping, cell counting, etc.Ideal for isolating rare cell populations

Advantages and Disadvantages

Flow Cytometry Advantages:
  • High Throughput: Can analyze thousands of cells per second.
  • Multiple Parameters: Measures multiple cellular properties simultaneously.
  • Cost-Effective: More affordable than FACS.
Flow Cytometry Disadvantages:
  • No Cell Sorting: Limited to analyzing cells without the ability to sort them.
FACS Advantages:
  • Cell Sorting Capability: Enables precise sorting and isolation of specific cell types.
  • High Precision: Ideal for rare cell populations or single-cell analysis.
FACS Disadvantages:
  • Lower Throughput: Slower than flow cytometry due to the sorting process.
  • Higher Cost: More expensive due to advanced technology.

Choosing Between Flow Cytometry and FACS

Your choice between flow cytometry and FACS depends on your research goals:

  • Choose Flow Cytometry if you need to analyze large numbers of cells quickly, want to identify and quantify cell populations, and don’t require cell sorting.
  • Choose FACS if you need to isolate specific cell populations for further studies, are working with rare cell types, or require single-cell analysis.

Applications in Research and Industry

Application AreaFlow CytometryFACS
ImmunologyIdentifying immune cell subpopulationsSorting T-cell subsets for functional studies
Cancer ResearchAnalyzing tumor cell markersIsolating cancer stem cells
Stem Cell ResearchCharacterizing stem cellsSorting specific stem cell populations
Clinical DiagnosticsDiagnosing immune disordersRare cell sorting for advanced diagnostics

Case Studies and Examples

  • Flow Cytometry in Cancer Research: Flow cytometry is often used to assess the expression of surface markers on cancer cells. For example, researchers can determine the presence of CD markers on leukemia cells, aiding in diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • FACS in Stem Cell Research: FACS has been instrumental in isolating stem cells from bone marrow, allowing researchers to conduct detailed studies on their differentiation potential.

Latest Innovations in Flow Cytometry and FACS

  • Automated Flow Cytometry: Advances in automation have enabled high-throughput screening, making flow cytometry more efficient for large-scale studies.
  • Multi-Parameter FACS: Modern FACS machines can now analyze and sort cells based on multiple markers simultaneously, enhancing sorting precision.

Which One is Right for You?

Understanding the differences between flow cytometry and FACS is crucial for selecting the right technique for your cell analysis needs. Flow cytometry offers rapid, multi-parameter analysis for large cell populations, making it ideal for initial screening and characterization. FACS, on the other hand, is perfect for applications that require the isolation of specific cell types for further experimentation.

For more guidance on choosing the right cell analysis technology, consider consulting with experts or using online platforms like Contract Laboratory to connect with labs specializing in flow cytometry and FACS services.

Author

  • Trevor Henderson BSc (HK), MSc, PhD (c), is the Creative Services Director for the Laboratory Products Group at LabX Media Group. He has more than three decades of experience in the fields of scientific and technical writing, editing, and creative content creation. With academic training in the areas of human biology, physical anthropology, and community health, he has a broad skill set of both laboratory and analytical skills. Since 2013, he has been working with LabX Media Group developing content solutions that engage and inform scientists and laboratorians.

    View all posts Director, Creative Services - LabX Media Group

Related Content

Advertisement

Editor's Choice

Advertisement

Advertisement